Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eileen Hemman |
13 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mike Langran |
22 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Murray |
26 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Brown |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
23 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Wright |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eileen Hemman |
4 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Brown |
20 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Murray |
2 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Wright |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Wright |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Oct 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Oct 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-6-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.