Peer Review reports
From: The role of a simulator-based course in coronary angiography on performance in real life cath lab
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulf Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kristin fraser |
| 12 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lars Konge |
| 17 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulf Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kristin fraser |
| 13 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lars Konge |
| 29 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulf Jensen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - kristin fraser |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Feb 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Mar 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.