Skip to main content

Table 2 Curricular priorities for business ethics in medical research

From: Curricular priorities for business ethics in medical practice and research: recommendations from Delphi consensus panels

Topic

Consensus for MS Curriculum

Mean for MS Curriculum

Consensus for PG Curriculum

Mean for PG Curriculum

The ideals of the medical research profession

YES (8/10)

4.3

YES (8/10)

4.2

- Pursuing new knowledge

- Developing new drugs and devices to serve patients

- Protecting the welfare of human and animal subjects

Potential problems that conflicts of interest cause

YES (8/10)

4.2

YES (10/10)

4.5

- Inappropriate participant recruitment

- Biased data publication and ghost authorship

- Shifting research priorities

Strategies for managing conflicts of interest in research

YES (8/10)

4.2

YES (9/10)

4.4

- Disclosure

- Increased oversight

- Divestment or recusal from specific roles

Challenges of playing the roles of both physician and researcher

YES (7/10)

4.0

YES (10/10)

4.5

- Possibility of ‘therapeutic misconception’—when patients mistake research participation for individualized therapy

- Conflicting roles could contribute to tacit pressure on patients to enroll or to biased presentation of consent information

Legal and policy issues surrounding conflicts of interest in research

YES (6/10)

3.8

YES (8/10)

4.4

- NIH conflict of interest policies

- Institutional policies

- Bayh-Dole act

Valid clinical research study design

NO (5/10)

3.7

YES (6/10)

4.0

- Good research practices

- Common deviations from good research practices

Issues in academic medical research centers

NO (2/10)

3.0

NO (4/10)

3.3

- Pressures to obtain grant and contract funding

- Pressures to publish

- Balancing roles as investigator and mentor/educator

Physician as entrepreneur, patent holder, and owner of data and materials

NO (2/10)

2.7

NO (4/10)

3.3

- Federal and institutional rules on patents and data ownership

- Managing conflicts of interest in ‘start up’ company research

- Managing institutional conflicts of interest

Institutional offices that provide information and oversight on fiscal matters in research

NO (3/10)

2.7

NO (5/10)

3.3

- Office of research services (or pre-award program)

- Office of sponsored programs (or post-award program)

- Conflict of interest committee

- Research integrity office

Research budgeting, costs, and billing

NO (2/10)

2.5

NO (3/10)

3.0

- OMB circular A-21 rules on allowable costs

    

- Effort reporting and conflicts of commitment

    

- Accurate budget development

    
  1. Legend:
  2. - MS = Medical Student.
  3. - PG = Post Graduate or Resident.
  4. Notes:
  5. - Consensus defined as >50% of panelists (n = 10) rated item as “very important” or “essential” (the top 2 of 5 ratings) in round 2. Results reflecting a consensus appear in boldface.
  6. - Topics listed in rank order using the MS curriculum mean scores.
  7. - Mean scores are based upon a 5-point Likert-type scale.
  8. - Beneath each major topic heading above, we list the bulleted subtopics that were presented along with the overarching topics that were rated. Many subtopics were based on topics presented in round 1; some were added by the project team prior to round 2.