Skip to main content

Table 1 Curricular priorities for business ethics in medical practice

From: Curricular priorities for business ethics in medical practice and research: recommendations from Delphi consensus panels

Topic

Consensus for MS Curriculum

Mean for MS Curriculum

Consensus for PG Curriculum

Mean for PG Curriculum

Problems that can arise from conflicts of interest

YES (10/12)

4.4

YES (9/12)

4.6

- Biased prescribing, advising on formularies, or selection of devices

- Harm to patient trust

- Bias operates unconsciously and unintentionally, making it difficult to manage

General healthcare organization and systems

YES (8/12)

4.1

YES (11/12)

4.4

- Medicaid/Medicare and private insurance industry

- Drivers of cost increases, gaps in system, and other challenges

- Alternative models, including international models

Fostering patient care quality and safety

YES (9/12)

4.1

YES (10/12)

4.3

The cost of medical errors

- Strategies for improving patient care quality

- Strategies for addressing medical errors

Medical professionalism, the goals of medicine, and their relationship to medical ethics

YES (7/12)

3.9

YES (8/12)

4.0

- Primacy of patient well-being in physician-patient relationship; fiduciary obligations

- Balancing secondary gains (to finances, career, or life-work balance) with obligations to patients

- Physicians as advocates for system change

The structure and ethical issues surrounding reimbursement systems for physicians

YES (7/12)

3.8

YES (10/12)

4.5

- Pay for performance

- Fee for service

- Managed care and capitated payment systems

Conflicts of interest arising from physician relationships with pharmaceutical and device industries

NO (6/12)

3.8

YES (8/12)

4.2

- Free samples as marketing

- Consulting relationships and speakers bureaus

- Sponsoring CME

The legal framework for the business of medicine

YES (7/12)

3.7

YES (9/12)

4.2

- False claims act, anti-kick back statute, Stark self-referral law

- Possible penalties and sanctions

- How law influences behavior

Good stewardship in resource utilization

NO (6/12)

3.6

YES (9/12)

4.2

- Exploring costs of competing treatment options

- Rationing strategies

- Value of stewardship when resources are limited

Oversight of the practice of medicine

NO (5/12)

3.1

NO (6/12)

3.5

- Self-regulation vs. government regulation

- Whistleblowing—mechanics, risks, protections, responsibilities

The business relationships of academic medical centers

- Influence of educational and research mission on patient care

NO (3/12)

2.9

NO (5/12)

3.5

- Financial pressures on academic medical centers and influence on medical practice

- Advantages and disadvantages of specific business relationships of academic medical centers

Disclosure rules and strategies for managing conflicts of interest

NO (2/12)

2.8

NO (5/12)

3.6

- Disclosure rules such as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act and institutional policies

- Strategies such as divestment or increased oversight

Resources physicians can consult on matters of business ethics and compliance

NO (2/12)

2.7

NO (5/12)

3.4

- Institutional resources, including compliance officers

- External resources, including Bar Association, health lawyers, CMS medical directors

- Educational materials, including Officer of Inspector General and Institute of Medicine publications

Mechanics of documentation, coding, billing and audits

NO (2/12)

2.6

NO (5/12)

3.6

- Accurate billing vs. upcoding

- Documentation—the need and best practices

Physician ownership of practices and facilities

NO (2/12)

2.6

NO (5/12)

3.7

- Advantages and disadvantages of ownership

    

- Avoiding violations of self-referral and kick back laws

    

Conflicting interests arising from ownership vs from working as employee or consultant

    
  1. Legend:
  2. - MS = Medical Student.
  3. - PG = Post Graduate or Resident.
  4. Notes:
  5. - Consensus defined as >50% of panelists (n = 12) rated item as “very important” or “essential” (the top 2 of 5 ratings) in round 2. Results reflecting consensus appear in boldface.
  6. - Topics listed in rank order using the MS curriculum mean scores.
  7. - Mean scores are based upon a 5-point Likert-type scale.
  8. - Beneath each major topic heading above, we list the bulleted subtopics that were presented along with the overarching topics that were rated. Many subtopics were based on topics presented in round 1; some were added by the project team prior to round 2
  9. - Bullets indicate subtopics that were presented along with the overarching topics that were rated. Many subtopics were based on topics presented in round 1; some were added by the project team prior to round 2.