Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive analysis of student characteristics and the response to questions on students’ role in vaccination promotion according to intervention group

From: Educating on professional habits: attitudes of medical students towards diverse strategies for promoting influenza vaccination and factors associated with the intention to get vaccinated

 

Total

Control

Web

Video

Tri-fold

p

group

brochure

Students surveyed, n

421

128

78

105

110

 

Previous clinical rotations,

113/421

38/128

12/78

27/105

36/110

 

n / total per group (%)

(26.8)

(29.7)

(15.4)

(25.7)

(32.7)

0.051

Female sex,

312/421

105/128

47/78

79/105

81/110

 

n / total per group(%)

(74.1)

(82.0)

(60.3)

(75.2)

(73.6)

0.007

Students with risk factors*,

29/415

9/128

6/77

5/102

9/108

 

n /total per group (%)

(7.0)

(7.0)

(7.8)

(4.9)

(8.3)

0.641

Students cohabiting with total persons with risk factors*,

80/416

29/125

14/78

16/103

21/108

 

n / total per group (%)

(19.2)

(23.0)

(17.9)

(15.2)

(19.1)

0.464

Vaccinated in previous fluseasons^,

122/421

29/128

22/78

33/105

38/110

 

n / total per group (%)

(29.0)

(22.7)

(28.2)

(31.4)

(34.6)

0.215

  1. *Risk factors: Obesity, pregnancy, chronic diseases (respiratory, heart, kidney or liver diseases), neuro or neuromuscular pathologies, spleen disorders, weakened immune system due to HIV infection or treatment that suppresses the immune system, age≥60years, and long-term aspirin therapy.
  2. ^Vaccinated in previous flu seasons: Vaccinated in ’07, ’08 or 09’ (including either seasonal or pandemic H1N1) seasons.
  3. p=Differences according to intervention received were calculated using the Chi-square test.