Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences between learning variables and outcomes among different motivational profiles [MANCOVA]

From: Motivational profiles of medical students: Association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion

 

Interest + status motivated (HIHC) Mean (SD)

Interest-motivated (HILC) Mean (SD)

Status-motivated (LIHC) Mean (SD)

Low-motivation (LILC) Mean (SD)

F

Eta squared (% of variance explained)

Intrinsic motivation (n = 844, scale score = 1-7)

5.70a (0.41)

5.07b (0.36)

4.63c (0.39)

3.85d (0.45)

452.72***

0.694 (69.4%)

Controlled motivation (n = 844, scale score = 1-7)

4.96a (0.74)

2.90b (0.69)

4.64c (0.57)

2.82b (0.88)

352.77***

0.639 (63.9%)

Deep strategy (n = 709, scale score = 1-5)

3.10a (0.55)

2.93b (0.62)

2.64c (0.58)

2.40d (0.65)

31.64 ***

0.137 (13.7%)

Surface strategy (n = 709, scale score = 1-5)

2.39a (0.62)

2.14b (0.52)

2.50a (0.57)

2.37a (0.59)

11.48 ***

0.054 (5.4%)

Self -study hours (n = 796)

14.16a,b (7.67)

14.65a (7.69)

12.77b (6.31)

13.20a,b (6.61)

3.05**

0.015 (1.5%)

ECs (n = 780)

21.39a (8.15)

19.84a (8.77)

20.95a (8.07)

20.23a (7.96)

1.126

0.004 (0.4%)

GPA (n = 780)

7.41a (0.93)

7.62a,b (0.76)

7.20c (0.93)

7.35a,c (0.86)

5.78***

0.028 (2.8%)

Exhaustion from study (n = 844, scale score = 0-6)

1.91a (1.03)

1.83a,b (0.99)

2.14a,c (1.03)

2.29c (1.06)

5.04**

0.025 (2.5%)

  1. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
  2. The means with different subscripts are significantly different from each other, i.e. a mean with subscript “a” is significantly different from a mean with subscript “b” or “c”.
  3. Effect sizes from Eta squared: Small = 0.01-0.06, Medium = 0.06-0.138, Large > 0.138 [32].