Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Satisfaction with ophthalmology residency training from the perspective of recent graduates: a cross-sectional study

Original Submission
29 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
9 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leah Levi
1 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Ingram
26 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leah Levi
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Ingram
4 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leah Levi
23 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leah Levi
31 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tatiana Millan
Resubmission - Version 8
31 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
21 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leah Levi
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
23 May 2013 Editorially accepted
27 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-75

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page