Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Hogg |
16 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Ambrose |
3 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Claire Teigland |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Hogg |
17 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Ambrose |
11 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Claire Teigland |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Ambrose |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Publishing | ||
29 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.