Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of course evaluation questionnaire by teaching faculty of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)

From: Interdisciplinary Integration of the CVS Module and Its Effect on Faculty and Student Satisfaction as Well as Student Performance

Items of comparison

2009/2010 Satisfaction Index

2010/2011 Satisfaction Index

Percentage of change

Integration is implemented during instruction

60

88

46

Learning objectives were made clear to students from the start

72

88

22

Learning objectives were made clear to faculty members from the start

70

80

17

Course encourages SDL

55

84

52

Course encourage group work

62

80

29

Course build students analytical and problem solving skills

55

84

52

PBL was successfully implemented as planned

60

92

53

Learning resources available helping in implementing the course objectives

45

88

95

Course web pages were relevant to course objectives

42

58

38

Number of staff members is sufficient in relation to tasks of the course

60

86

43

There is alignment between the course objectives, instruction and assessment

46

84

82

Assessment is based on a blueprint.

40

60

33

Various methods of assessment are used

55

70

30

Formative assessment without scores are used

60

84

38

Early feedback is provided to students

61

84

37

There is continuous and final summative assessment

70

90

28

The course team utilizes the results of interpretation of item analysis

55

82

49

Overall statistical index

53

80

51