Table 4 Opinion questionnaire after clinical sessions: Second Life as an teaching environment and comparison with other face-to-face and distance methods
Question | Answer | % (n/N) |
|---|---|---|
Does it matter to you to be represented by an avatar? | “it doesn’t matter”, “we aren’t aware of it” | 32.89% (25/76) |
“no”, “not in the least”, “it’s fun” | 35.53% (27/76) | |
no response | 31.58% (24/76) | |
Did you think it was positive being able to see the speaker, setting and presentations? | “yes”, “positive” | 26.32% (20/76) |
“we only saw the screen” | 47.36% (36/76) | |
“we didn’t care”, “it didn’t matter” | 26.32% (20/76) | |
In general, did you like this tool? | “yes”, “it let us connect with other centres in the zone” | 100% (76/76) |
Do you consider it better than other distance learning methods? | “yes”, “much better”, “by far” | 65.79% (50/76) |
no response | 32.21% (26/76) | |
Do you consider it better than other face-to-face learning methods? | “yes, in some aspects”, “it's more comfortable” | 38.16% (29/76) |
“it depends” | 2.63% (2/76) | |
“no” | 57.89% (44/76) | |
no response | 1.32% (1/76) |