Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Balslev |
26 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Win May |
27 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Fernandez Luque |
4 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Matheson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Balslev |
24 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Win May |
24 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Fernandez Luque |
10 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Matheson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Fernandez Luque |
21 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Matheson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
12 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-125 |
You can find further information about peer review here.