Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Kariuki |
18 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noeline Nakasujja |
4 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Kariuki |
21 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noeline Nakasujja |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
25 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
25 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-53 |
You can find further information about peer review here.