Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Gerber |
9 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnstein Finset |
16 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Allen |
21 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Edwardsen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnstein Finset |
15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Gerber |
20 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Allen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Edwardsen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Edwardsen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Edwardsen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.