Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect

Original Submission
12 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myriam Deveugele
23 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Blue
18 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Blue
9 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myriam Deveugele
3 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 8
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
26 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Hans Martin Bosse
Resubmission - Version 9
26 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
31 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-10-27

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page