Skip to main content

Table 8 URiM subgroup analysis of clinical reasoning

From: Medical student perceptions of assessments of clinical reasoning in a general surgery clerkship

Assessment

URiM (n = 19)

Non-URiM (n = 84)

p-value

Preceptor evaluations

10 (52.36%)

36 (42.86%)

0.6043

Oral examination

16 (84.21%)

67 (79.76%)

0.9667

Oral examination feedback

14 (73.68%)

66 (78.57%)

0.5928

Clinical documentation

11 (57.89%)

61 (72.62%)

0.5106

Clinical documentation feedback

15 (78.95%)

74 (88.10%)

0.5954

OSCE

15 (78.95%)

52 (64.29%)

0.4235

OSCE feedback

13 (68.42%)

59 (70.24%)

0.8481

  1. Subgroup analysis by those who identified as URiM. Percentage Strongly Agree and Agree reported. P-value is for the Wilcoxon Rank Sum analysis. Seven missing surveys excluded
  2. Subgroup analyses for student perceptions of insight into clinical reasoning. Due to the number of tests, a multiplicity adjustment (Bonferroni Adjustment) was implemented, the associated significance level of determination is now .05/5 = .01