Skip to main content

Table 5 Radiographers self-assessed use of competences related to the “Technical and Radiographic Processes”

From: Assessment of radiographers’ competences from the perspectives of radiographers and radiologists: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania

B. Competences related to the “Technical and Radiographic Processes”

Rate of applicationa

Overall evaluation, %

0–5 years (I)

>5–15 years (II)

>15–25 years (III)

>25 years (IV)

p-value

Pairwise comparisona

Organizing and planning taking account of the clinical situation

1–3

10.8

20.5

1.4

11.3

13.8

0.014

A

4

10.4

11.4

8.2

17

7.5

 

5–6

78.8

68.2

90.4

71.7

78.8

A

Responsibility for preparing the medico-technical equipment

1–3

1.2

4.5

0

1.9

0

0.011

 

4

7.6

11.4

1.4

15.1

6.3

 

5–6

91.2

84.1

98.6

83

93.6

A

Prioritizing patients in the work flow

1–3

8.8

18.2

5.5

7.5

7.5

0.023

 

4

14.8

2.3

16.4

11.3

22.5

C

5–6

76.4

79.5

78.1

81.1

70

 

Adapting the examination to the patient’s prerequisites and needs

1–3

8.8

9.1

12.3

3.8

8.8

0.007

 

4

14

9.1

4.1

28.3

16.3

D

5–6

77.2

81.8

83.6

67.9

75

 

Minimizing radiation doses for patient and staff

1–3

6

13.6

5.5

0

6.3

0.014

 

4

11.2

4.5

5.5

15.1

17.5

 

5–6

82.8

81.8

89

84.9

76.3

 

Optimizing the quality of the image

1–3

8.8

4.5

2.7

22.6

7.5

0.001

D

4

10.4

13.6

4.1

9.4

15

 

5–6

80.8

81.8

93.2

67.9

77.5

D

Preliminary assessment of images

1–3

18.4

29.5

19.2

18.9

11.3

0.015

 

4

16.8

15.9

8.2

28.3

17.5

D

5–6

64.8

54.5

72.6

52.8

71.3

 
  1. aevaluation of the application of the competence in professional activity: 1–3 sometimes; 4 often; 5–6 almost always
  2. p-value of the Chi criterion (A. I-II; B. I-III; C. I-IV; D. II-III; E. II-IV; F. III-IV - values of pairwise comparison)