Peer Review reports
From: Insights into the Angoff method: results from a simulation study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Oct 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohammad Jalili |
| 9 Nov 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniël Van Nijlen |
| 21 Nov 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Boaz Shulruf |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Nov 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniël Van Nijlen |
| 18 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohammad Jalili |
| 26 Feb 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Boaz Shulruf |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Feb 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 6 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniël Van Nijlen |
| 25 Apr 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Boaz Shulruf |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Apr 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Apr 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 May 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-016-0656-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.