Table 2 Evaluation measures
From: Translating evidence-based guidelines to improve feedback practices: the interACT case study
Aim of evaluation | Type of data | Data collection method | Stakeholder |
|---|---|---|---|
To evaluate engagement with the interACT process: cover page and feedback journal | Quantitative: feedback engagement survey | Feedback engagement audit | Students |
To evaluate the impact of interACT on student satisfaction and perceived value to their learning, as well as challenges and enablers to engaging with interACT | Quantitative: impact on workload, satisfaction with interACT Qualitative: Perceptions of improvement in self-review ability, affective feeling of motivation or isolation and recommendations for change | Semi-structured interviews; online survey (via Bristol Online Survey); end of module evaluation report | Students |
To evaluate the impact of interACT on staff satisfaction and perceived value to their learning, as well as challenges and enablers to engaging with interACT | Qualitative: experiences with interACT, satisfaction and recommendations for change | Semi-structured interviews; external examiner report | Tutors |
To evaluate the impact of interACT on administrative staff satisfaction and workload, as well as challenges and enablers to engaging with interACT | Qualitative: experiences with interACT and nature and number of questions received from students about assessment and feedback | Semi-structured interviews | Administrative staff |
To evaluate transferability of the interACT project to the wider HE community | Qualitative: feedback, shared ideas and experiences | Engagement with workshops/ webinar | JISC community |