Evaluation of an international faculty development program for developing countries in Asia: the Seoul Intensive Course for Medical Educators

Table 3 Evaluation of level 1 (reaction) of the Kirkpatrick model – comparison between modules (Post-program survey, n = 16)

Questions	Module 1	Module 2	Module 3	Module 4	Module 5	Module 6	Module 7	Module 8	Spearman’s rho^c
PP 1. Overall satisfaction^a	5.47 ± 0.52								-
PP 2. Most Relevant to one’s personal needs^b	10	8	9	6	2	2	3	8	.890^*
PP 3. Most helpful^b	6	6	6	8	7	1	5	9	0.457
PP 4. Hopes to be lengthened^b	0	2	4	4	3	6	7	15	−0.267
PP 5. Hopes to be shortened^b	2	0	1	2	4	1	2	1	−0.329

^*p < 0.01
^aOverall satisfaction with the SICME program as a whole. Rating scale: 1 (Very unsatisfied) – 6 (Very satisfied); ^bFellow were asked to select three or less modules per item. The number of fellows who selected the modules is shown in the cells – i.e. maximum is 16 and minimum is 0; ^ccorrelation to the item PM 10 (Overall satisfaction for each module)

ISSN: 1472-6920