Table 2 Pre- and post-assessment of trainer’s feedback (T1 and T2) High-frequency feedback group
High-frequency feedback group (HFF group) N = 23 | Low-frequency feedback group (LFF group) N = 24 | p-value 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
After Peyton’s step 4 (T1) | |||
Item 1 The tutor’s feedback was comprehensible. | 5.83 ± .38 | 5.84 ± .38 | .931 |
Item 2 I could easily follow the tutor’s instructions. | 5.39 ± .66 | 5.17 ± .96 | .077 |
Item 3 The feedback was helpful for improving skills. | 5.78 ± .42 | 5.79 ± .51 | .382 |
Item 4 The tutor was attentive and concentrated. | 5.83 ± .39 | 5.83 ± .38 | .931 |
Item 5 The tutor seemed competent during feedback. | 5.83 ± .39 | 5.87 ± .34 | .518 |
Mean Items 1-5 | 5.73 ± .31 | 5.70 ± .46 | .876 |
After the final, sixth repetition (T2) | |||
Item 1 The tutor’s feedback was comprehensible. | 5.96 ± .21 | 6.00 ± .00 | 1.000 |
Item 2 I could easily follow the tutor’s instructions. | 5.83 ± .39 | 5.58 ± .50 | .224 |
Item 3 The feedback was helpful for improving skills. | 5.91 ± .29 | 5.96 ± .20 | .108 |
Item 4 The tutor was attentive and concentrated. | 5.87 ± .34 | 5.92 ± .28 | .351 |
Item 5 The tutor seemed competent during feedback. | 6.00 ± .00 | 5.92 ± .28 | 1.000 |
Mean Items 1-5 | 5.91 ± .17 | 5.88 ± .19 | .341 |
p-value 2 | .004 | .018 | |