Skip to main content

Table 2 Ranking of task elements according to perceived impact on performance improvement

From: Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design

Taska

Constituentatask

Student (S)

Nb

Sum

Rc

  

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

S7

S8

S9

S10

S11

S12

S13

S14

   

Prepare Task

Study manual

 

9

          

4

 

2

13

9

 

Study cases

8

8

9

4

 

9

8

4

 

4

6

 

7

 

10

67

5

Perform in PT role

Give performance

9

6

8

9

9

8

9

8

7

9

8

9

8

 

13

107

1

 

Receive peer FB

5

 

6

6

7

3

3

5

5

7

7

7

 

8

12

69

4

 

Receive expert FB

6

 

7

7

8

2

4

6

6

8

9

8

5

9

13

85

2

 

Receive patient FB

        

4

     

1

4

12

 

Receive score

      

2

 

3

    

4

3

9

10

Perform in assessor role

Observe performance

4

4

4

5

6

7

7

9

9

5

4

5

 

6

13

75

3

 

Give oral FB

 

7

3

 

5

6

6

7

8

 

3

4

 

5

10

54

6

 

Give written FB

    

4

         

1

4

12

 

Give Score

 

3

   

5

        

2

8

11

Perform in patient role

 

7

5

 

8

 

4

5

 

2

3

5

 

6

 

9

45

7

Write reflection report

   

5

 

3

1

1

 

1

6

 

6

9

7

9

39

8

  1. aTasks presented for ranking are bold face.
  2. bN of students that selected the task for ranking.
  3. cFinal rank order.
Back to article page

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us