Table 3 Strengths of the assessment processes

· Multiple forms of assessment – fairer for candidates in terms of examination format preferences and assesses candidates on different areas of competency

· Practical examination – seeing the candidate put theory into practice

· Examination difficulty –stringent test of eligibility for registration to practice in Australia

· Multiple examiners – improves fairness of decisions

· Independent examiners – improves fairness of decisions

· Consistency across Australia and New Zealand – minimises the possibility of candidates ‘shopping’ for easier assessment

· Consistency across candidates

· Consistency across all registration applicants – as all applicants including Australian university graduates, Australian-trained professionals re-entering the profession and overseas-trained professionals have the same basis for assessment there is ‘absolute equity’ and no perception that assessment may be more difficult for overseas applicants

· Transparent – providing candidates with comprehensive information on the assessment process was seen as beneficial to reduce candidate stress and decrease the chance of candidate complaints

· Conducted over time – minimises the possible bias from a candidate who has a ‘bad day’

· Case-by-case assessment – each course and qualification considered can be examined on its merits rather than being rejected because it is not on a pre-approved list

· Rigorous process – assessment guidelines allow for cross-checking and panel referral for borderline applicants; stringent documentation checking including references; and strict examination monitoring

· No need to come to Australia – reduces the cost for candidates

· Onus on candidate to provide evidence – ensures the candidate has had to consider and reflect on the Australian standards to fulfil the assessment criteria

· Rigorous assessment development – reduces future problems by putting in high levels of effort and resources from the beginning

· Good and varied staff – enhancing examination development by engaging professionals from a variety of backgrounds who understand the assessment process and do not alienate other examiners