From: Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
Variable | Control (n = 22) | Mentored (n = 24) |
---|---|---|
Mean number of invitations to review (95%CI) | 15 (5 to 24) | 23 (14 to 32) |
Mean number of reviews declined (95%CI) | 2 (0 to 4) | 5 (3 to 6) |
Percent of invitations declined (95%CI) | 13% (5% to 22%) | 23% (15% to 32%) |
Mean number of reviews completed (95%CI) | 10 (6 to 14) | 10 (6 to 14) |
Mean review score all reviews (95%CI) | 3.4 (3.1 to 3.8) | 3.5 (3.2 to 3.9) |
Mean review score for the first 3 reviews (95%CI) | 3.5 (3.1 to 3.9) | 3.5 (3.2 to 3.9) |
Mean slope of change of review scores (95%CI) | -0.23 (-0.66 to -0.18) | -0.55 (-0.83 to -0.27) |