Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of significances and means of groups

From: eMedOffice: A web-based collaborative serious game for teaching optimal design of a medical practice

 

pre

retro

post

St.

Sig r

Sig p

m e

Sig e

Sig p

m r

Sig e

Sig r

m p

1)

.512

< .001

3.794

.512

< .001

3.714

< .001

< .001

4.512

2)

.225

< .001

3.512

.225

< .001

3.686

< .001

< .001

4.410

3)

1.00

< .001

3.410

1.00

< .001

3.456

< .001

< .001

4.315

4)

.030

< .001

2.282

.030

< .001

2.714

< .001

< .001

3.769

5)

.571

< .001

3.076

.571

< .001

3.294

< .001

< .001

4.156

6)

.023

< .001

2.923

.023

< .001

3.342

< .001

< .001

4.290

7)

.160

< .001

2.948

.160

< .001

3.323

< .001

< .001

4.210

  1. The first column statement (St.) shows the index number of the used statements that were introduced in chapter evaluation design. Columns Sig{e, r, p} show computed p-values of the paired t-test for pre (Sige), retro (Sigr) and post (Sigp) groups. Columns m{e, r, p} show the computed mean values of self-reports according to statements 1-7 (see Table 1).
Back to article page

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

Contact us