Peer Review reports
From: Using entrustable professional activities to guide curriculum development in psychiatry training
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Brittlebank |
16 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clare Oakley |
2 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Parkin |
7 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
23 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
23 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
23 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-96 |
You can find further information about peer review here.