Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Boker |
18 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen DiCarlo |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
23 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elie Akl |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen DiCarlo |
5 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Boker |
12 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elie Akl |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
22 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elie Akl |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
22 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
25 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-10-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.