Areas | comments (n) | Comments (examples) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Clarity | Relevance | Optimization | Evaluability | Basic or QI? | Unrelated | Total |  |
1. Mission and Objectives | 41 | 4 | 4 | 3 | - | 1 | 53 | - It is better to mention ‘health problems’ instead of the phrase 'transnational aspects of health’. (clarity, QI1-1-2) - Given the difference in mission statements of universities, this standard can be contrary to the goals of universities. (relevance, QI1-1-2) - Standards of this area should be formulated based on the local characteristics of each university. (optimization, area) - Standard has been written in a general statement and it is not evaluable. (evaluability, B1-1-3) |
2. Instructional Program | 104 | 2 | 25 | 12 | 20 | 2 | 159* | - Religion, creed and race should be considered in the definition of educational justice. (clarity, B2-1-3) - There is no need for complementary and alternative medicine for the general practitioner. (relevance, B2-2-3) - This standard is applicable if the geographical and demographic conditions and facilities of the region allow. (optimization, B2-4-3) - How is the occurrence of competency-based education measured? (evaluability, B2-1-2) |
3. Assessment of Students | 27 | - | 8 | 3 | 5 | - | 40* | - The purpose of the summative assessment should be explained in detail. (clarity, B3-1-4) - Usually, the conditions for using various assessment methods are not provided. (optimization, B3-1-3)Provision of requirements and conditions for improving student learning is ambiguous and cannot be evaluated. (evaluability, OI3-1-3) |
4. Students | 58 | - | 19 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 89* | - It is necessary to prepare a printed and electronic handbook for students and provide it to newcomers. (clarity, B4-1-3) - The standard is not applicable since the admission process is centralized. (optimization, QI4-1-1)The type of students’ characteristics that are going to be surveyed studied by should be specified; Based on that, its evaluability can be determined. (evaluability, B4-1-1) |
5. Academic Staff/Faculty | 57 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 77* | - Delete the word ' selection’. (clarity, QI5-1-1) - It is mostly at the disposal of the medical school. (relevance, B5-1-1) - Considering the cultural characteristics of universities, it cannot be implemented everywhere (optimization, B5-2-4)It is difficult to measure the two verbs, familiarity and paying enough attention. (evaluability, B5-2-6) |
6. Educational Resources | 80 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 101* | - Does the ‘covered population’ refer to the needs of students or the needs of society? (clarity, QI6-2-1) - This standard is the mission of the university, not the medical school. (relevance, QI6-2-1) - Medical schools must be independent in terms of financial resources so that this standard can be implemented (optimization, B6-4-2)Two items "adequate number and variety of patients" and "supervision of clinical training" cannot be evaluated. (evaluability, B6-2-1) |
7. Program Evaluation | 50 | 2 | 2 | - | 3 | - | 57 | - It is better to change the order of B7-1-1 and B7-1-2. (clarity, B7-1-1) - This standard is useless as long as student admission is concentrated. (relevance, B7-2-2) - In order to fulfill this standard, specialized counseling centers must be located in the medical school (optimization, B7-2-2) |
8. Governance and Administration | 40 | - | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 48* | - It is better to change the order of B7-1-1 and B7-1-2. (clarity, B7-1-1) - Due to the different missions of our university, this standard has limited implementation (optimization, B8-5-1)It is difficult to measure this standard. (evaluability, B8-5-1) |
Set of standards (overall) | 8 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9* | - The accountability of medical school to the community has less been emphasized in these standards and is reduced to the participation of stakeholders. (clarity) - Expectations from medical schools are set at the level of the university president and in some cases at the level of the ministry. (optimization) - The standards are developed as global statement and do not include numerical or quantitative indicators that stabilize them. (evaluability) |
Total | 465 | 11 | 85 | 34 | 49 | 13 | 633* | - |
* Some comments in this area pointed to two criteria. |