Table 2 Domain ratings for the EAP and SOAP formats for all respondents with exposure to either formata
From: Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient rounds: a survey study
Students | Residents | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Domain | EAP (n = 25) | SOAP (n = 61) | EAP (n = 36) | SOAP (n = 55) |
Allowed you to adequately convey your thought process | 4.48 | 3.97 | 4.56 | 3.78 |
Allowed adequate time for discussion of the patient’s subjective experience | 4.04 | 3.92 | 4.36 | 3.87 |
Encouraged you to distill pertinent information in your presentation | 4.68 | 3.63 | 4.61 | 3.33 |
Encouraged you to integrate information from the history, exam, and studies in developing an assessment and plan | 4.68 | 3.63 | 4.53 | 3.53 |
Encouraged you to focus on your assessment and plan | 4.64 | 3.50 | 4.67 | 3.13 |
Helped you learn from your own patients | 4.28 | 3.95 | 4.25 | 3.71 |
Helped you learn from your peers | 4.16 | 3.70 | 4.11 | 3.58 |
Is effective in advancing patient care | 4.44 | 3.83 | 4.25 | 3.63 |
Is time-efficient | 4.44 | 2.93 | 4.36 | 2.64 |
Is easy to use | 3.88 | 4.02 | 4.03 | 3.80 |