Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in preparedness level for empathic communication tasks at baseline (T1), six-week follow-up (T2), and three-to-six month follow up (T3)

From: Can teaching serious illness communication skills foster multidimensional empathy? A mixed-methods study

  

T1

Mean (SD)

T2

Mean (SD)

T3

Mean (SD)

Effect sizea

Differencesb

N

T1 vs T2

T2 vs T3

T1 vs T3

Discuss bad news with a patient/family member about serious illness

98

2.64 (0.72)

3.08 (0.55)

3.41 (0.61)

1.15

T1<T2**

T2<T3**

T1<T3**

Respond to a patient/family member’s emotions

98

2.47 (0.69)

3.11 (0.55)

3.42 (0.66)

1.41

T1<T2**

T2<T3**

T1<T3**

Use nonverbal communication in serious illness conversations

98

2.86 (0.70)

3.42 (0.63)

3.68 (0.67)

1.21

T1<T2**

T2<T3**

T1<T3**

Use verbal expressions of empathy in serious illness conversations

98

2.78 (0.68)

3.31 (0.62)

3.61 (0.64)

1.27

T1<T2**

T2<T3**

T1<T3**

Elicit a patient/family’s needs or concerns

98

2.87 (0.65)

3.24 (0.69)

3.57 (0.64)

1.09

T1<T2**

T2<T3**

T1<T3**

  1. SD Standard deviation
  2. **Denotes P <0.001
  3. aCohen’s d effect sizes were calculated to identify significant differences in scores between T1 and T3
  4. bPaired t-test