Skip to main content

Table 1 Student responses to the IPCLEI (n = 19)

From: Evaluation of interprofessional student teams in the emergency department: opportunities and challenges

Item

Mean/SD

1. The purpose (learning objectives) of this placement was made clear

4.32 (0.75)

2. I need more orientation to this placement

2.74 (1.01)

3. Orientation was relevant and well organized

4.05 (0.71)

4. The teaching strategies helped my learning

3.63 (0.76)

5. My preference is for the teachers to be of the same discipline as the student

3.79 (0.98)

6. I valued having more than my own discipline being involved in teaching

4.00 (0.88)

7. There was too much supervision in this placement

2.58 (1.07)

8. This clinical placement was interesting

4.05 (0.91)

9. The workload was too heavy

2.21 (0.63)

10. There was too much pressure on me in this placement

2.26 (0.87)

11. This clinical placement was well organized

3.53 (0.07)

12. I usually had a clear idea of what was expected of me

3.84 (0.76)

13. I achieved the discipline specific learning objectives set by my university

3.84 (0.76)

14. My other student commitments did not interfere with my involvement in this placement

3.63 (1.01)

15. The placement provided me with sufficient learning opportunities

4.11 (0.81)

16. I felt as if I belonged to the ward

3.84 (1.21)

17. The teachers were friendly and approachable

4.32 (0.58)

18. This placement has given me new insights into how a ward is run and managed

4.26 (0.81)

19. After this placement I understand more fully my discipline’s role in the IP clinical team

4.05 (0.71)

20. After this placement I have a greater understanding of the role and function of other disciplines in health care

4.26 (0.56)

21. I felt comfortable in asking for advice or assistance when necessary from my student colleagues

4.58 (0.61)

22. I felt uncomfortable taking the lead in a student group

2.37 (0.89)

23. I felt uncomfortable sharing responsibility for delivery of health care

1.89 (0.57)

24. I felt comfortable putting forward my opinions in a group

4.11 (0.57)

25. After this placement I have a better understanding of the patient’s role in healthcare decision-making

4.05 (0.85)

26. I felt comfortable communicating with patients and their families to seek their input into care

4.42 (0.51)

  1. NOTE: Ratings from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Six negatively worded questions are highlighted with italics, however these indicate positive support for the program