Skip to main content

Table 1 Qualitative Content Analysis of Open-Ended Questions on Student Satisfaction

From: Integrated clinical case discussions – a fully student-organized peer-teaching program on internal medicine

Category

k*

Example

Subcategory

General Format

45

 

general appraisal of the tutorial

27

“ICCD sessions are the best course this semester […]”

interaction rated as positive

9

“[…] no other class has that level of interaction […]”

clinical cases rated as useful for practicing lab results

5

“Discussing lab results to this extent was great!”

appropriate group size

2

“Using virtual break-out groups was a good idea.”

positive atmosphere incentivizes participation

2

“I enjoyed the tension-free atmosphere, that encouraged me to participate, even if my contributions had to be corrected”

Feedback on Tutors

40

 

expression of gratitude

15

“Many thanks to the tutor!”

tutor exhibits good didactic skill

12

“[…] As a tutor for paramedics myself I am always surprised by the didactic skills that [ICCD-]tutors exhibit.”

explicit praise of the tutor (not further specified)

8

“Excellent tutor! […]”

tutor is highly motivated

5

"Thanks a lot for the effort and motivation that goes into preparing the tutorials.”

Value

24

 

participants learned a lot

15

“Great seminar, with many take-home lessons.”

call for preserving ICCD in the next semesters/expanding to other subjects

9

“[…] Please continue [ICCD] at all costs!”

Improvement suggestions

14

 

duration too long or too short

5

“[…] a bit long.”

the online tool (zoom) needs to be optimized for discussion

3

“[…] regrettably discussions via Zom tend to be a bit lame[…]”

tutees request factsheets and slides before the ICCD sessions

2

“A factsheet on history taking and physical examination would be appreciated […]”

more self-directed, active learning requested

2

“ […] less content, more time for active learning, please.”

more interaction requested

2

“Almost too much direct instruction, please include more time for discussions […]”

  1. *test segments that were categorized
  2. Overview of the categories and subcategories of the open-ended questions. Statements (n = 57, k = 123) provided further information on the acceptance of ICCD and improvement suggestions for future semesters