Skip to main content

Table 5 Regression models for predicting employee burnouta

From: Assessing relational coordination and its impact on perceived mental health of students, teachers and staff in a clinical skills program during the COVID-19 pandemic

Variables

Burnout

 

Model1a

Model2a

Model3a

Model4a

Model5a

Model6a

Model7a

Model8a

Total RC

-0.56*

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Frequent Comm

-

-0.42NS

-

-

-

-

-

-

Timely Comm

-

-

-0.41NS

-

-

-

-

-

Accurate Comm

-

-

-

-0.24NS

-

-

-

-

Problem-Solving Comm

-

-

-

-

-0.43NS

-

-

-

Shared Goals

-

-

-

-

-

-0.63**

-

-

Shared Knowledge

-

-

-

-

-

-

-0.77**

-

Mutual Respect

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-0.11NS

Participants’ position

Management & Administration

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Teaching Staff

0.66 NS

0.50 NS

0.70 NS

0.67 NS

-0.06 NS

-0.37 NS

0.10 NS

-0.29 NS

Medical Students

1.30**

1.12*

1.20**

1.27**

0.87 NS

0.59 NS

1.09*

1.02 NS

Constant

5.00***

4.68***

4.36***

3.76***

4.88**

5.61***

5.90***

3.54***

Adjusted R2

0.11

0.09

0.09

0.07

0.08

0.18

0.21

0.07

F-TEST(P-VALUE)

3.84*

3.15*

3.87*

2.58NS

1.38NS

5.27**

4.52**

1.90NS

  1. NS No statistical significance
  2. *p < 0.05
  3. **p < 0.01
  4. ***p < 0.001
  5. aThe regression models used proportional weights to adjust for lower response rate among certain groups