Skip to main content

Table 2 Influence of descriptive versus simulated-experience formats on correct risk estimates of the benefits and harms of long-term administration of strong opioids for general practitioners and pain specialists

From: Educating physicians on strong opioids by descriptive versus simulated-experience formats: a randomized controlled trial

 

Proportion of correct estimates (%) at T1

 

Absolute increase from baseline (T0) in the proportion (%) of correct estimates at T1

 
 

Fact box

Simulation

p*

(Cramer’s V)

95% CI**

Fact box

Simulation

p*

(Cramer’s V)

95% CI

General practitioners

 Reduction in pain

8.7

4.7

.166 (.080)

0.76 – 4.52

7.3

4.7

.331 (.056)

0.63 – 3.94

 Increase in physical function

48.7

42.7

.297 (.060)

0.89 – 1.46

22.7

17.3

.330 (.086)

0.83 – 2.07

 Risk of falls/ fractures

19.3

19.3

1.00 (.000)

0.63 – 1.59

10.7

9.3

.700 (.022)

0.68 – 1.57

 Risk of misuse/ addiction

44.7

47.3

.643 (.027)

0.74 – 1.21

22.7

22.0

.758 (.043)

0.58 – 2.26

 Risk of dizziness

46.0

47.3

.817 (.013)

0.76 – 1.24

20.0

18.7

.803 (.038)

0.67 – 1.70

 Risk of nausea, obstipation, or vomiting

30.7

29.3

.801 (.015)

0.74 – 1.48

15.3

14.0

.896 (.027)

0.63 – 1.89

Pain specialists

 Reduction in pain

9.3

6.7

.395 (.049)

0.64 – 1.27

9.3

6.0

.342 (.085)

0.69 – 3.48

 Increase in physical function

40.7

42.7

.815 (.014)

0.73 – 1.27

24.0

17.3

.292 (.091)

0.88 – 2.17

 Risk of falls/ fractures

30.0

14.7

.001*(.184)

1.29 – 3.23

14.7

8.7

.236 (.098)

0.88 – 3.23

 Risk of misuse/ addiction

45.3

37.0

.090 (.151)

1.10 – 1.99

13.3

13.3

.954 (.018)

0.56 – 1.78

 Risk of dizziness

62.0

62.0

1.00 (.000)

0.84 – 1.19

14.7

16.7

.318 (.087)

0.52 – 1.49

 Risk of nausea, obstipation, or vomiting

48.7

40.7

.163 (.080)

0.93 – 1.54

15.3

15.3

.929 (.022)

0.59 – 1.70

  1. T0 = investigation at baseline, T1 = investigation immediately after the interventions
  2. *Significance level is two-tailed and based on a chi-square test
  3. ** 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk ratio between intervention groups