Skip to main content

Table 2 Response percentage and median of the levels of MI training (n = 400)

From: Musculoskeletal imaging authority, levels of training, attitude, competence, and utilisation among clinical physiotherapists in Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey

Diagnostic imaging modality

Poor

(1)

Fair

(2)

Good

(3)

V. Good

(4)

Excellent

(5)

Median

(1–5)

Radiography (X-ray).

3.5%

20.8%

43.0%

26.2%

6.5%

3

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

29.3%

40.0%

24.7%

4.7%

1.3%

2

Computed tomography (CT scan).

39.0%

39.0%

17.8%

3.5%

0.7%

2

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Scan.

77.0%

15.8%

5.5%

1.5%

0.2%

1

Scintigraphy (bone scan).

78.3%

16.5%

3.7%

1.3%

0.2%

1

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA or DXA).

84.5%

10.5%

4.3%

0.7%

0.0%

1

  1. These are responses to the question “On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good and 5 = excellent, how do you rate your current level of training in referral and utilisation of the following modalities?” Part C: The median (range) of participants’ total score was fair, 10 (6 to 26), expected range = 6 to 30