Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of teaching effects between the two groups

From: Comparison of case-based learning combined with Rain Classroom teaching and traditional method in complete denture course for undergraduate interns

  

Test group

Control group

P value

Teaching content

Relates to clinical practice

1.36 ± 0.49

1.43 ± 0.50

0.650

Highlights the key points and explains the difficulties thoroughly

1.36 ± 0.58

1.43 ± 0.50

0.674

Teaching method

Uses heuristic and discussion teaching

1.41 ± 0.50

1.75 ± 0.65

0.047*

Uses modern educational technology

1.41 ± 0.85

1.64 ± 0.78

0.318

Teaching result

Helps improve classroom efficiency

1.50 ± 0.67

1.68 ± 0.55

0.306

Helps cultivate self-study ability

1.64 ± 0.79

1.46 ± 0.58

0.396

Helps absorb knowledge rapidly

1.36 ± 0.58

1.32 ± 0.48

0.779

Creates an active classroom atmosphere

1.45 ± 0.51

1.93 ± 0.81

0.021*

Stimulates interest and initiative in learning

1.50 ± 0.67

1.64 ± 0.68

0.462

Helps cultivate speculative ability

1.55 ± 0.60

1.46 + 0.51

0.606

  1. *There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05)