From: Patient handoffs among general surgery residents in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
Reasons | Minor harm N (%) | Major harm N (%) |
---|---|---|
The verbal handoff instructions did not contain the most current information | 25(64.1%) | 6(100%) |
The written/electronic handoff instructions did not contain the most current information | 18(46.1%) | 4(66.6%) |
Interruptions during the handoff process | 15(38.4%) | 2(33.3%) |
Language barriers between the residents | 2(5.1%) | 1(16.6%) |
Knowledge base problems from either of the residents | 16(41%) | 4(66.6%) |
Time constraints affecting the outgoing resident | 14(35.9%) | 2(33.3%) |
Time constraints affecting the incoming resident (you) | 7(17.9%) | 1 (16.6%) |
Interpersonal conflicts between the incoming and outgoing residents | 6(15.3%) | 0(0%) |
Lack of an interactive handoff process (handoff instructions given without the opportunity for questions and answers) | 22(56.4%) | 1(16.6%) |
The handoff was conducted in a distracting environment. (e.g., hospital hallway or emergency department) | 11(28.2%) | 0(0%) |
Reasons why residents did not discuss incomplete handoffs resulting in minor and major harm with their colleagues | ||
Avoid confrontation with their colleagues | 4 (30.7%) | 1 (100%) |
Lack of time | 3 (23%) | 0 |
No major harm caused to the patient | 2(15.3%) | 0 |
The residents who gave the handoff instructions were more senior than the residents | 2(15.3%) | 0 |
Forgot about it | 1(7.6%) | 0 |
Overwhelmed with long call hours | 1(7.6%) | 0 |