Skip to main content

Table 4 Elements of verbal and written handoff practices reported by the surgical residents during the handoff processa

From: Patient handoffs among general surgery residents in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

Characteristics

Verbal n (%)

Written n (%)

Name of each patient

47(61.8%)

39(72.2%)

Age of each patient

52(68.4%)

46 (85.1%)

Date of admission for each patient

27(35.5%)

39 (72.2%)

Primary physician for each patient

69(90.7%)

28 (51.5%)

Type of surgical procedure(s) performed for each patient during their current admission

66(86.8%)

50(92.5%)

Date of procedure(s) for each patient

48(63.1%)

39 (72.2%)

Relevant prior surgical procedure(s) for each patient

42(55.2%)

46(85.1%)

Clinical course for each patient’s current admission

48(63.1%)

33 (61.1%)

Complications experienced by each patient

61(80.2%)

31 (57.4%)

Comorbidities

55(72.3%)

31(57.4%)

Medications for each patient

26(34.2%)

40(74%)

Diet information for each patient

27(35.5%)

19(35.1%)

Code status for each patient (if any recent change)

29(38.1%)

18(33.3%)

Identification of the sickest patient on the list

47(61.8%)

22(40.7%)

Pending laboratory results for follow-up

59(77.6%)

25(46.3%)

Pending consults for evaluation

60(78.9%)

41(75.9%)

Pending radiological tests for follow-up

63(82.8%)

42(77.7%)

Anticipated issues or problems

50(65.7%)

44(81.4%)

New consults/admissions

47(61.8%)

33(61.1%)

  1. athe frequency is different from the total participants (n = 75) due to missing responses for some of the characteristics