Table 3 Analysis of satisfaction with the teaching methods and content
Item | m ± SD |
|---|---|
Teaching strategies | 4.07 ± .53 |
The preparatory videos increased my understanding of the course | 4.14 ± .65 |
The IRATs increased learning motivation | 4.01 ± .73 |
The TRATs increased mutual learning among group members | 4.02 ± .65 |
The discussion activities enhanced the applicability of course content | 4.06 ± .58 |
The learning time of the course was flexible | 4.15 ± .65 |
The learning space of the course was flexible | 4.26 ± .63 |
The course increased my interest in learning | 4.01 ± .62 |
The course reduced learning stress | 3.95 ± .84 |
The course ran smoothly | 4.06 ± .60 |
The course content is easy to absorb | 4.09 ± .62 |
Helpfulness of the course modules to practice | 4.13 ± .55 |
Introduction to the HL concept | 4.21 ± .56 |
Oral communication | 4.14 ± .65 |
Written communication | 4.11 ± .61 |
Community HL interventions | 4.10 ± .60 |
Case discussion of communication with the elderly | 4.15 ± .59 |
Case discussion of community HL interventions | 4.05 ± .63 |
Overall feedback | 4.06 ± .58 |
Familiarity with HL after the course | 4.10 ± .56 |
Execution power of providing HL services after the course | 3.89 ± .61 |
Overall, I am satisfied with the course | 4.12 ± .53 |
The next course should adopt the same model | 4.11 ± .63 |