Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of interviewee survey data before and after interviews (n = 25)

From: Perceived effectiveness of video interviews for orthopaedic surgery residency during COVID-19

5-Point Likert Questions

Mean Before (Average ± SD)

Mean After

(Average ± SD)

Median, IQR Before

Median, IQR After

p-value

I feel the need to apply/I actually applied to more programs because of video interviews

3.64 ± 1.19

2.72 ± 1.18

4, 3–4

3, 2–4

0.0027

I believe that the financial burden of in-person interviews is/was relieved by video interviews

4.64 ± 0.48

4.52 ± 0.64

4, 4–5

5, 4–5

0.023

I feel that in-person interviews give a better representation of the culture of a residency

4.64 ± 0.56

4.56 ± 0.64

5, 4–5

5, 4–5

0.021

I feel that in-person interviews allow you to get a better sense of a residency program as a whole

4.72 ± 0.45

4.28 ± 0.83

5, 4–5

4, 4–5

0.01

I feel more likely to accept a video interview because of reduced cost of travel/other expenses

3.68 ± 1.12

3.72 ± 0.96

4, 3–5

4, 3–5

0.0084

I would prefer a hybrid interview style with both video and in-person components

3.24 ± 1.17

3.72 ± 1.25

4, 2–4

4, 3–5

0.004

I would rather do in-person interviews than video interviews

4.48 ± 0.57

4.08 ± 0.62

5, 4–5

4, 4–4

0.23

Video interviews provide more flexibility for my schedule

4.36 ± 0.74

4.68 ± 0.55

4, 4–5

5, 4–5

0.11

I feel this survey adequately assessed my perceptions of video interviews

3.92 ± 0.68

4.08 ± 0.48

4, 3–4

4, 4–4

0.001

  1. All 5-point Likert Question answer choices ranged from Strongly Disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5). These numerical translations were used to calculate response averages and standard deviation
  2. IQR Interquartile Range, SD Standard Deviation