Skip to main content

Table 2 Pre- and post-intervention results for standardized parent Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) by checklist item

From: An educational intervention to facilitate appropriate subspecialty referrals: a study assessing resident communication skills

 

Pre-intervention (n = 64)

Post-intervention (n = 63)

 
 

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

P-value*

1. The resident showed interest in me as a person

83.9 (11.1)

91.1 (10.8)

 < 0.001

2. The resident made me feel that he/she was glad that I brought my child in today

81.4 (11.9)

88.3 (10.4)

 < 0.001

3. The resident used words that I understood

83.4 (11.2)

89.5 (9.2)

0.003

4. The resident used nonverbal behaviors that conveyed attentive listening

83.6 (11.6)

91.3 (9.4)

 < 0.001

5. The resident asked me what was the most concerning factor for us today

55.5 (40.9)

82.5 (27.2)

 < 0.001

6. The resident asked me how I feel about the situation

64.8 (40.5)

78.6 (30.7)

0.071

7. The resident validated my concern/feelings

97.7 (13.9)

97.6 (10.7)

1.000

8. The resident noted that I seemed sad/mad/distressed/worried

58.6 (40.4)

73.0 (34.6)

0.024

9. The resident made empathetic statements (That must be difficult)

93.8 (18.9)

93.7 (21.0)

1.000

10. The resident engaged me in an exchange to arrive to the plan

87.5 (28.2)

97.6 (10.7)

0.012

11. The resident made a final decision with regard to referral

98.4 (8.8)

98.4 (8.8)

1.000

 

% (n)

% (n)

 

12. If no referral was made, the resident successfully helped you to feel reassured that this is not a life threatening condition

82.6 (38)

97.8 (45)

0.008

13. If a referral was made, the resident helped you understand the reason for the referral

96.1 (49)

98.0 (50)

0.564

14. If a referral was made, the resident explained that this could be a life threatening condition

70.6 (36)

80.4 (41)

0.166

15. If a referral was made, the resident explained what you could expect when you see the Cardiologist

51.9 (27)

75.0 (39)

0.011

16. If a referral was made, the resident recognized and managed the logistics of the referral

76.9 (40)

96.2 (50)

0.002

17. If a referral was made, the resident clarified plan with the family and ensured conceptual understanding and agreement on logistics of the plan

76.0 (38)

98.0 (49)

0.002

18. If a referral was made, the resident explained that exercise restriction is needed

84.3 (43)

100 (51)

0.005

19. If a referral was made, the resident decided on the urgency of the referral

90.4 (47)

98.1 (51)

0.103

 

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 

20. Provided ongoing patient care and informed us when to call her/him back

60.3 (38.3)

80.2 (35.4)

 < 0.001

Total Score

82.7 (10.9)

91.7 (5.0)

 < 0.001

  1. *Analysis by Sign test for items 1–11, 20 (Likert distribution of data); McNemar’s test for items 12–19 (Nominal data); Paired t-test for total score
  2. SD Standard deviation