Skip to main content

Table 2 Survey questions for experimental participants

From: Impact of classroom-based MASK-ED™ (KRS simulation) on physiotherapy student clinical performance: a randomized cluster trial

 

Very unhelpful

(0)

Somewhat unhelpful

(1)

Neutral

(2)

Somewhat helpful

(3)

Very helpful

(4)

Confidence engaging with an older person

     

Developing rapport and empathy with patients

     

Manual handling skills

     

Communicating with an older patient

     

Explaining treatments without using jargon

     

Ability to step into the physiotherapist role

     

Ability to apply theory to practice

     

Interest / engagement with the material covered in the unit

     

Remembering practical lessons from the classroom

     

Self-reflection and learning from mistakes in a safe environment

     

Potential to learn from other students’ experiences (peer learning)

     

Ability to give / receive feedback

     

Readiness to undertake the practical exam

     

Readiness to undertake clinical placement

     

Do you think that MASK-ED™ simulation has been beneficial in any other way to enhance learning? Please describe.

In the classroom, is MASK-ED™ simulation more valuable for students than just practicing on each other? Please explain why / why not:

Are there any negative aspects to including MASK-ED™ simulation in the Physiotherapy classroom?

On balance, do you think we should continue MASK-ED™ simulation as a feature of the UC Physiotherapy curriculum? Please explain why / why not: