Skip to main content

Table 1 The presence of traditional and non-traditional FAP criteria in Taiwan’s medical schools compared to an international cohort. The numbers are percentages

From: Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis

  Assistant Professor Associate Professor Full Professor
Criteria Taiwan (N = 12) Rice cohort (N = 49) Taiwan (N = 12) Rice cohort (N = 79) Taiwan (N = 12) Rice cohort (N = 26)
Traditional criteria
 1. Any quantitative or qualitative mention about publications required 100 80 100 96 100 95
 2. Any quantitative or qualitative mention about the specific authorship order in publications 100 22 100 35 100 34
 3. Any mention of journal impact factor 100 24 100 30 100 28
 4. Any mention of grant funding 0 53 67 63 67 67
 5. Any mention requiring that research is recognized at a national or international level 0 22 17 33 17 47
Non-traditional criteria
 6. Any mention of citations 0 24 0 29 0 28
 7. Any mention of data sharing 0 2 0 1 0 1
 8. Any mention of publishing in open access mediums 0 0 0 0 0 0
 9. Any mention of registration (including preregistration challenge) of studies 0 0 0 0 0 0
 10. Any mention made of adherence to reporting guidelines for publications 0 0 0 0 0 0
 11. Any mention of alternative metrics for sharing research (e.g., social media and print media) 0 6 0 4 0 2
 12. Any mention of accommodations or adjustments to expectations due to employment leave (e.g., parental leave, medical leave) 33 45 33 35 33 35