Table 3 Student evaluation of course (n = 16–26)
From: Remote online global health education among U.S. medical students during COVID-19 and beyond
| Â | Strongly disagree | Slightly disagree | Neutral/ ambivalent | Slightly agree | Strongly agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The course was well-organized | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (11.5%) | 23 (88.5%) |
This course has prepared me to work more effectively in resource-limited settings | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (46.2%) | 14 (53.8%) |
The course content is appropriate for my level of training and experience | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (42.3%) | 15 (57.7%) |
I would recommend this course to my classmates and colleagues | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (7.7%) | 24 (92.3%) |
The guest lecturers were well prepared and knowledgeable | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 26 (100.0%) |
The practical skill sessions helped clarify the instruction | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (15.4%) | 11 (42.3%) | 10 (38.5%) |
A video-conferencing platform was an effective way to learn global health knowledge | 0 (0%) | 2 (7.7%) | 2 (7.7%) | 8 (30.8%) | 14 (53.8%) |
A video-conferencing platform was an effective way to learn global health practice | 2 (7.7%) | 8 (30.8%) | 7 (26.9%) | 4 (15.4%) | 5 (19.2%) |