From: GENESISS 2—Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review
Author, date (Country) | Research topic | Setting and participants | Outcome methods and measures | Study type Quality assessment (JBI level of evidence) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Andreatta 2011 [87] (US) | Viability and effectiveness of a simulation-based paediatric mock code program on patient outcomes, as well as residents’ confidence in performing resuscitations | Children’s hospital (n = 41) | 1. Survival rates | Prospective observational Quality assessment – moderate (3e) |
Barni 2018 [79] (Italy) | Improve management of anaphylaxis | Paediatric ED (n = 30) | 1. Clinical management | Prospective observational Quality assessment—good (3e) |
Ben-Ari 2018 [80] (Israel) | Improve safety practice of ED sedation | ED (n = 16) | 1. Sedation performance scores | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Braddock 2014 [90] (US) | Improve clinical outcomes and safety culture | Inpatient units (n = 303) | 1. Incidence of septic shock 2. Incidence of respiratory failure | Prospective observational Quality assessment: good (3e) |
Coggins 2019 [86] (Australia) | Improve mechanical CPR performance | (n = 112) | 1. CPR performance scores | RCT Risk of bias: moderate (1c) |
Generoso 2016 [91] (US) | Improve nurses' responses in the first 5 min of in-hospital emergencies | (n = 147) | 1. Clinical management | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Gibbs 2018 [88] (US) | Diagnose and correct LST to mitigate a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak | NICU (n = 99) | 1. Hand hygiene 2. MRSA outbreaks | Prospective observational Quality assessment: good (3e) |
Hamilton 2015 [93] (US) | Improving technical and interprofessional skills during an emergent simulated open thoracotomy | Â | 1. Time taken to complete procedure | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Josey 2018 [85] (US) | Survival rates following In-hospital cardiac arrest for hospitals more and less active in in-situ mock code training | 26 Hospital sites | 1. Survival rates | Prospective observational Quality assessment: good (3e) |
Knight 2014 [84] (UK) | Improving survival to discharge and code team performance after paediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest | (n = 169 patients. CG = 123 / IG = 46) | 1. Survival 2. Neurological morbidity 3. Adherence to standards | Observational with historical controls Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Kobayashi 2012 [81] (US) | Determine baseline performance of ED telemetry for detecting arrhythmias and improve system performance through human factors engineering (HFE) | ED | 1. Detection of ventricular tachycardia and sinus bradycardia | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate—good (3e) |
Lavelle 2017 [2] (UK) | To improve management of medical deterioration | mental health settings (N = 53) | 1. Incident rates | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Marshall 2015 [94] (US) | To improve team training for postpartum haemorrhage | Community maternity hospitals (n = 22) | 1. Clinical management 2. Response times | Prospective observational Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |
Sleeman 2018 [92] (UK) | To improve the identification and treatment of hypoglycaemia | Hospital ward | 1. Number of incidents | Prospective observational (QI) Quality assessment: low—moderate (4) |
Steinemann 2011 [82] (US) | Evaluate the impact of a team training curriculum on team communication, coordination and clinical efficacy of trauma resuscitation | ED (n = 137) | 1. Resuscitation time | Prospective cohort Quality assessment: moderate – good (3e) |
Sullivan 2015 [83] (US) | Improve retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities for in-hospital cardiac arrests | (n = 72) | 1. Clinical management 2. Response times | RCT Risk of bias: moderate (Ic) |
Theilen 2013 [89] (UK) | Evaluate the long-term impact of ongoing regular team training on hospital response to deteriorating ward patients, patient outcome and financial implications | PICU (admissions n = 139) | 1. Response times 2. Clinical management 3. Transfer times | Prospective cohort Quality assessment: moderate (3e) |