From: The educational value of an audience response system use in an Iraqi medical school
A | Preparation phase: | Â |
1 |  Time consumed in learning how to use the ARS is reasonable. | Disagree |
2 |  Time consumed in preparing ARS questions and slides for the lecture is reasonable. | Agree. |
3 |  Level of difficulty in learning and using ARS is within my skills level. | Strongly agree. |
4 |  Using ARS is practical and convenient in terms of lecture preparation. | Agree. |
5 |  Preparing and incorporating ARS questions for each lecture requires reasonable efforts. | Neutral |
B | Lecture delivery phase: | Â |
1 |  Using ARS does not affect the amount of lecture content I can deliver. | Agree |
2 |  I observe more interaction from students using ARS in the lecture. | Strongly agree. |
3 |  I noticed more thinking and deeper involvement from students using ARS. | Strongly agree. |
4 |  I feel more enthusiastic to teach more and better using ARS. | Strongly agree |
5 |  I enjoy using ARS. | Strongly agree. |
6 |  I feel I deliver a better-quality lecture using ARS. | Strongly agree. |
7 |  I have a better sense of students understanding of the topic using ARS. | Strongly agree |
8 |  ARS helps me tailor the lecture according to the students’ understanding and needs. | Agree |
9 |  ARS helps me to evaluate students’ overall knowledge and performance. | Agree |
10 |  Overall, I find the ARS is an efficient tool of teaching. | Strongly agree |