Skip to main content

Table 3 Educator’s perception of the ARS use

From: The educational value of an audience response system use in an Iraqi medical school

A

Preparation phase:

 

1

 Time consumed in learning how to use the ARS is reasonable.

Disagree

2

 Time consumed in preparing ARS questions and slides for the lecture is reasonable.

Agree.

3

 Level of difficulty in learning and using ARS is within my skills level.

Strongly agree.

4

 Using ARS is practical and convenient in terms of lecture preparation.

Agree.

5

 Preparing and incorporating ARS questions for each lecture requires reasonable efforts.

Neutral

B

Lecture delivery phase:

 

1

 Using ARS does not affect the amount of lecture content I can deliver.

Agree

2

 I observe more interaction from students using ARS in the lecture.

Strongly agree.

3

 I noticed more thinking and deeper involvement from students using ARS.

Strongly agree.

4

 I feel more enthusiastic to teach more and better using ARS.

Strongly agree

5

 I enjoy using ARS.

Strongly agree.

6

 I feel I deliver a better-quality lecture using ARS.

Strongly agree.

7

 I have a better sense of students understanding of the topic using ARS.

Strongly agree

8

 ARS helps me tailor the lecture according to the students’ understanding and needs.

Agree

9

 ARS helps me to evaluate students’ overall knowledge and performance.

Agree

10

 Overall, I find the ARS is an efficient tool of teaching.

Strongly agree