Skip to main content

Table 1 Objectives, outcomes, and implementation of SBME in Thai medical schools

From: Simulation-based medical education in Thailand: a cross-sectional online national survey

Topic

Administrator data (N = 15)

Learning objective (n (%))

Overall

For teaching

For evaluation

For research

  Psychomotor tasks

15 (100)

15 (100)

11 (73.3)

5 (33.3)

  Medical knowledge

14 (93.3)

14 (93.3)

13 (86.7)

4 (26.7)

  Patient care

14 (93.3)

14 (93.3)

13 (86.7)

4 (26.7)

  Communication skills

14 (93.3)

12 (80.0)

12 (80.0)

4 (26.7)

  Professionalism

12 (80.0)

10 (66.7)

10 (66.7)

4 (26.7)

  Decision making

12 (80.0)

11 (73.3)

10 (66.7)

3 (20.0)

  Team management

12 (80.0)

12 (80.0)

11 (73.3)

3 (20.0)

  Leadership

11 (73.3)

9 (60.0)

8 (53.3)

2 (13.3)

Instructor data (N = 154) a

Pre-clinical year (1st-3rd year; N = 26)

Clinical year (4th-6th year; N = 133)

The expected outcome of the SBME course (n (%))

 Improving knowledge

17 (65.4)

71 (53.4)

 Improving attitude

14 (53.8)

61 (45.9)

 Improving performance

21 (80.8)

106 (79.7)

 Improving practice

16 (61.5)

86 (64.7)

 Improving patient outcomes

10 (38.5)

43 (32.3)

Type of simulators (n (%))

 Part task trainer

21 (80.8)

98 (73.7)

 High fidelity mannequin

7 (26.9)

74 (55.6)

 Standardized patients

16 (61.5)

68 (51.1)

 Screen-based simulation

4 (15.4)

15 (11.3)

 Cadaver

4 (15.4)

6 (4.5)

Teaching characteristics (mean (SD))

 Teaching duration per course (hours)

2.7 (0.7)

3.3 (4.6)

 Preparation duration (hours)

4.5 (3.2)

3.0 (5.1)

 Courses per year (times)

2.8 (3.0)

6.7 (4.7)

 Students per class (person)

33.0 (22.7)

15.4 (9.1)

  1. aFive instructors taught both pre-clinical and clinical year medical students