Skip to main content

Table 2 Students’ self-evaluation of their satisfaction and views about the practicality of each part of their court-based learning

From: Developing an innovative medical ethics and law curriculum—constructing a situation-based, interdisciplinary, court-based learning course: a mixed methods study

Satisfaction
  Highly Dissatisfied
(1) (n, %)
Dissatisfied
(2) (n, %)
Neutral
(3) (n, %)
Satisfied
(3) (n, %)
Highly Satisfied
(5) (n, %)
Mean
Introduction I 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (11) 44 (47) 40 (42) 4.32 ± 0.66
Introduction II (role-play) 1 (1) 1 (1) 16 (17) 38 (40) 39 (41) 4.19 ± 0.83
Audit a court case 0 (0) 1 (1) 9 (10) 45 (51) 34 (38) 4.26 ± 0.68
Panel discussion I (Q&A) 0 (0) 3 (3) 16 (18) 42 (46) 30 (33) 4.09 ± 0.80
Panel discussion II (sharing of experience) 0 (0) 3 (3) 18 (20) 39 (43) 31 (34) 4.08 ± 0.82
Practicality
  Not at All Useful (1) (n, %) Not Useful (2) (n, %) Neutral (3) (n, %) Useful (4) (n, %) Very Useful (5) (n, %) Mean
Introduction I 0 (0) 1 (1) 12 (14) 45 (51) 31 (34) 4.19±0.71
Introduction II (role-play) 6 (7) 1 (1) 29 (32) 33 (37) 21 (23) 3.69±1.06
Audit a court case 1 (1) 0 (0) 19 (23) 33 (39) 31 (37) 4.11±0.84
Panel discussion I (Q&A) 2 (2) 1 (1) 16 (19) 42 (49) 25 (29) 4.01±0.86
Panel discussion II (sharing of experience) 1 (1) 0 (0) 18 (21) 42 (49) 25 (29) 4.05±0.78