Skip to main content

Table 2 Students’ self-evaluation of their satisfaction and views about the practicality of each part of their court-based learning

From: Developing an innovative medical ethics and law curriculum—constructing a situation-based, interdisciplinary, court-based learning course: a mixed methods study

Satisfaction

 

Highly Dissatisfied

(1) (n, %)

Dissatisfied

(2) (n, %)

Neutral

(3) (n, %)

Satisfied

(3) (n, %)

Highly Satisfied

(5) (n, %)

Mean

Introduction I

0 (0)

0 (0)

10 (11)

44 (47)

40 (42)

4.32 ± 0.66

Introduction II (role-play)

1 (1)

1 (1)

16 (17)

38 (40)

39 (41)

4.19 ± 0.83

Audit a court case

0 (0)

1 (1)

9 (10)

45 (51)

34 (38)

4.26 ± 0.68

Panel discussion I (Q&A)

0 (0)

3 (3)

16 (18)

42 (46)

30 (33)

4.09 ± 0.80

Panel discussion II (sharing of experience)

0 (0)

3 (3)

18 (20)

39 (43)

31 (34)

4.08 ± 0.82

Practicality

 

Not at All Useful (1) (n, %)

Not Useful (2) (n, %)

Neutral (3) (n, %)

Useful (4) (n, %)

Very Useful (5) (n, %)

Mean

Introduction I

0 (0)

1 (1)

12 (14)

45 (51)

31 (34)

4.19±0.71

Introduction II (role-play)

6 (7)

1 (1)

29 (32)

33 (37)

21 (23)

3.69±1.06

Audit a court case

1 (1)

0 (0)

19 (23)

33 (39)

31 (37)

4.11±0.84

Panel discussion I (Q&A)

2 (2)

1 (1)

16 (19)

42 (49)

25 (29)

4.01±0.86

Panel discussion II (sharing of experience)

1 (1)

0 (0)

18 (21)

42 (49)

25 (29)

4.05±0.78