Table 3 Student perceptions of CWPs as a study tool (N = 267)a
From: Crossword puzzle as a learning tool to enhance learning about anticoagulant therapeutics
Perception Survey Items | Mean (SD) | Strongly Agree N (%) | Agree N (%) | Neutral N (%) | Disagree N (%) | Strongly Disagree N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The CWP provided enhanced my learning | 4.1(0.9) | 87(32.6) | 119(44.6) | 45(16.9) | 9(3.4) | 7(2.6) |
Enjoyed classmate interaction and reviewing material while solving the CWP. | 4.1(0.9) | 107(40.1) | 104(39) | 42(15.7) | 9(3.4) | 5(1.9) |
CWP oriented us to the topics that we should focus on. | 4.1(0.8) | 99(37.1) | 121(45.3) | 35(13.1) | 7(2.6) | 5(1.9) |
Length of time provided for solving the CWP was sufficient. | 3.9(0.9) | 95(35.6) | 100(37.5) | 49(18.4) | 18(6.7) | 5(1.9) |
The material on the CWP was pertinent. | 3.9(0.8) | 80(30) | 118(44.2) | 61(22.8) | 3(1.1) | 5(1.9) |
Learned more from the class because of the CWP. | 3.8(0.9) | 65(24.3) | 115(43.1) | 64(24) | 18(6.7) | 5(1.9) |
Solving CWP is a good review of the material covered in the lecture. | 4.0(0.8) | 92(34.5) | 125(46.8) | 37(13.9) | 9(3.4) | 4(1.5) |
Extra credit should be associated with activities such as a CWP. | 4.0(0.9) | 102(38.2) | 94(35.2) | 52(19.5) | 13(4.9) | 6(2.2) |