|
Small group learning
|
|
1
|
There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL.
|
49 (15.1)
|
66 (20.4)
|
89 (27.5)
|
67 (20.7)
|
53 (16.4)
|
3.03 (1.29)
|
|
2
|
The students themselves read the problem case scenario that is given by the facilitator.
|
6 (1.9)
|
9 (2.8)
|
20 (6.2)
|
45 (13.9)
|
244 (75.3)
|
4.58 (0.87)
|
|
3
|
The group leader engages all the students in the discussion equally.
|
8 (2.5)
|
32 (9.9)
|
76 (23.5)
|
101 (31.2)
|
107 (33)
|
3.82 (1.07)
|
|
4
|
The students have a chance to talk more than the facilitator.
|
5 (1.5)
|
9 (2.8)
|
58 (17.9)
|
111 (34.3)
|
141 (43.5)
|
4.15 (0.92)
|
|
5
|
The students express their point of view by hand-raising (without interrupting other students’ points of view).
|
13 (4)
|
34 (10.5)
|
74 (22.8)
|
115 (35.5)
|
88 (27.2)
|
3.71 (1.09)
|
|
6
|
The scribe writes the main point of the discussion.
|
5 (1.5)
|
6 (1.9)
|
40 (12.3)
|
68 (21)
|
205 (63.3)
|
4.43 (0.89)
|
|
7
|
The students themselves identify the learning objectives.
|
2 (0.6)
|
14 (4.3)
|
46 (14.2)
|
115 (35.5)
|
147 (45.4)
|
4.21 (0.88)
|
|
8
|
A student summarizes the case scenario at the beginning of the second part of the tutorial (second session).
|
19 (5.9)
|
33 (10.2)
|
70 (21.6)
|
81 (25)
|
121 (37.3)
|
3.78 (1.21)
|
|
9
|
The students do the presentation appropriately for the second part of the tutorial (second session).
|
3 (0.9)
|
13 (4)
|
31 (9.6)
|
84 (25.9)
|
193 (59.6)
|
4.39 (0.88)
|
|
10
|
A student summarizes the case scenario at the end of the second part of the tutorial (second session) “case integration”.
|
24 (7.4)
|
35 (10.8)
|
53 (16.4)
|
76 (23.5)
|
136 (42)
|
3.82 (1.28)
|
|
11
|
Learning resources (e.g. library, computers, and IT support) are provided to support the learning process.
|
17 (5.2)
|
29 (9)
|
59 (18.2)
|
87 (26.9)
|
132 (40.7)
|
3.89 (1.19)
|
|
Overall mean
| |
3.98
|
|
Problem case scenario
|
|
1
|
PBL case scenarios are clearly written.
|
8 (2.5)
|
10 (3.1)
|
48 (14.8)
|
120 (37)
|
138 (42.6)
|
4.14 (0.95)
|
|
2
|
PBL case scenarios have an appropriate trigger.
|
8 (2.5)
|
14 (4.3)
|
54 (16.7)
|
129 (39.8)
|
119 (36.7)
|
4.04 (0.96)
|
|
3
|
PBL case scenarios generate a range of differential diagnoses (in the first session).
|
6 (1.9)
|
12 (3.7)
|
63 (19.4)
|
111 (34.3)
|
132 (40.7)
|
4.08 (0.95)
|
|
4
|
PBL case scenarios have an appropriate level of difficulty.
|
6 (1.9)
|
11 (3.4)
|
68 (21)
|
132 (40.7)
|
107 (33)
|
4.0 (0.92)
|
|
5
|
PBL case scenarios are related (contextualized) to local settings
|
8 (2.5)
|
18 (5.6)
|
72 (22.2)
|
107 (33)
|
119 (36.7)
|
3.96 (1.02)
|
|
Overall mean
| |
4.04
|
