|
Small group learning
|
|
1
|
There is proper students’ training before starting the PBL.
|
2 (4.3)
|
1 (2.2)
|
8 (17.4)
|
9 (19.6)
|
26 (56.5)
|
4.22 (1.08)
|
|
2
|
The students themselves read the problem case scenario that is given by the facilitator.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
3 (6.5)
|
42 (91.3)
|
4.89 (0.37)
|
|
3
|
The group leader engages all the students in the discussion equally.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
7 (15.2)
|
27 (58.7)
|
12 (26.1)
|
4.11 (0.63)
|
|
4
|
The students have a chance to talk more than the facilitator.
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
2 (4.3)
|
11 (23.9)
|
32 (69.6)
|
4.61 (0.67)
|
|
5
|
The students express their point of view by hand-raising (without interrupting other students’ points of view).
|
1 (2.2)
|
0 (0)
|
6 (13)
|
28 (60.9)
|
11 (23.9)
|
4.04 (0.75)
|
|
6
|
The scribe writes the main point of the discussion.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
8 (17.4)
|
37 (80.4)
|
4.78 (0.46)
|
|
7
|
The students themselves identify the learning objectives.
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
3 (6.5)
|
23 (50)
|
19 (41.3)
|
4.3 (0.69)
|
|
8
|
A student summarizes the case scenario at the beginning of the second part of the tutorial (second session).
|
2 (4.3)
|
3 (6.5)
|
5 (10.9)
|
9 (19.6)
|
27 (58.7)
|
4.22 (1.14)
|
|
9
|
The students do the presentation appropriately for the second part of the tutorial (second session).
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
3 (6.5)
|
14 (30.4)
|
29 (63)
|
4.57 (0.61)
|
|
10
|
A student summarizes the case scenario at the end of the second part of the tutorial (second session) “case integration”.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
5 (10.9)
|
13 (28.3)
|
28 (60.9)
|
4.5 (0.68)
|
|
11
|
Learning resources (e.g. library, computers and IT support) are provided to support the learning process.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
6 (13)
|
10 (21.7)
|
30 (65.2)
|
4.52 (0.71)
|
|
Overall mean
| |
4.43
|
|
Problem case scenario
|
|
1
|
PBL case scenarios are clearly written.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
18 (39.1)
|
27 (58.7)
|
4.57 (0.54)
|
|
2
|
PBL case scenarios have an appropriate trigger.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
4 (8.7)
|
18 (39.1)
|
24 (52.2)
|
4.43 (0.65)
|
|
3
|
PBL case scenarios generate a range of differential diagnoses (in the first session).
|
0 (0)
|
1 (2.2)
|
4 (8.7)
|
16 (34.8)
|
25 (54.3)
|
4.41 (0.74)
|
|
4
|
PBL case scenarios have an appropriate level of difficulty.
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
5 (10.9)
|
20 (43.5)
|
21 (45.7)
|
4.35 (0.67)
|
|
5
|
PBL case scenarios are related (contextualized) to local settings
|
0 (0)
|
3 (6.5)
|
6 (13)
|
18 (39.1)
|
19 (41.3)
|
4.15 (0.88)
|
|
Overall mean
| |
4.38
|
